Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities Selection Report for Funding Commencing in 2024

[TOC]

Overview

The Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities scheme provides funding for research infrastructure, equipment and facilities to Eligible Organisations. It enables researchers to participate in cooperative initiatives so that expensive research infrastructure, equipment and facilities can be shared between higher education organisations and also with industry. The scheme also fosters collaboration through its support of the cooperative use of international or national research facilities.

The objectives of the Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities scheme are to:

• support excellent basic and applied research and research training through the acquisition of research equipment and infrastructure and access to national and international research facilities; and
• encourage Eligible Organisations to develop collaborative arrangements with other Eligible Organisations and/or Partner Organisations for the acquisition and use of research equipment and infrastructure or access to national and international facilities.

Selection Process

Applications for funding commencing in 2024 opened on 25 January 2023 and closed on 29 March 2023. Applications were submitted through the Australian Research Council (ARC) Research Management System (RMS). This report outlines outcomes from the selection process for that round.

These outcomes are based on advice from the ARC Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) which:

• assessed applications and reviewed assessments made by independent assessors
• reviewed applicants’ comments on assessors’ reports
• ranked each application relative to the others on the basis of the application, the assessors’ reports and applicants’ responses to those assessments
• assessed and recommended budgets;

and, advice from the ARC’s National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP) Eligibility Committee which:

• considered eligibility issues identified by ARC staff, the members of the ARC College of Experts or independent assessors
• where required, sought advice from the ARC’s Medical Research Advisory Group
• made recommendations to the CEO in respect of ineligible applications.

This report reflects the outcomes approved by the Minister. Unless otherwise specified, data presented in this report exclude withdrawn applications.

Assessment Criteria

All applications that meet the eligibility criteria for Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 were assessed and merit ranked using the following assessment criteria:

1. Investigator(s)/Capability (20%)

Describe the:

• demonstrated record in these activities (for CIs and PIs who will manage the purchase, design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and coordination of access to the proposed research infrastructure); and
• relevance of the research infrastructure to the research capacity and planned activities of each CI and PI on the application and, where relevant, to the research groups represented on the application.

2. Project quality and innovation (25%)

Describe the:

• aims and significance of the research that will be supported by LIEF funding;
• relevance of the proposed research infrastructure to the needs of ARC and other competitively funded research projects/programs;
• importance of equipment for the training of research students;
• enhancement of support for areas of existing and/or emerging research strength; and
• demonstrated national or international focus for large scale cooperative initiatives.

3. Feasibility and strategic alignment (25%)

Describe the:

• extent to which the project represents value for money;
• feasibility of the plan to use the research infrastructure;
• relevance of the research to the strategic priorities of the organisations;
• evidence that each of the organisations is genuinely committed to, and prepared to collaborate in, the project;
• existing or planned strategic research alliances between the higher education organisation(s) and other organisation(s);
• effectiveness of cooperative arrangements for the management and sharing of the proposed research infrastructure, including arrangements for ongoing operational expenditure where applicable; and
• extent to which the project aligns with Australian Government priority areas.

If the project involves research infrastructure pertaining to Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities describe:

• the strategies for enabling collaboration with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities (for example, dialogue/collaboration with an Indigenous cultural mentor);
• any existing or developing, supportive and high-quality research relationships with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander research communities; and
• any personal affiliations with local Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities that can facilitate the proposed research infrastructure.

4. Benefit (10%)

Describe the:

• benefit of the proposed research infrastructure to the broader research community;
• capacity to contribute to Australian Government priority areas, such as the National Manufacturing Priorities; and
• where relevant, the extent to which the applicants have identified the freedom to operate in the Intellectual Property and patent landscape to enable future benefits to industry.

5. Suitability/Need (20%)

Describe the:

• demonstrated needs from the researchers and/or research projects that they will utilise the proposed research infrastructure, including level of demand and likely measurable impact on the research program, including beyond the project activity period;
• availability of and access to similar research infrastructure at organisational, regional, national and/or international level;
• planned rate of use of the proposed research infrastructure, including proposed arrangements for broader access to individuals not named on the application;
• alignment of the planned use with other similar existing infrastructure within Australia and/or internationally; and
• special needs for regional or otherwise remote institutions.

Assessment process

The ARC assessment process for Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 involved 18 SAC members as a part of one multidisciplinary panel and was managed in the RMS. A total of 343 independent assessors’ reports were submitted to the ARC.

Funding levels and duration

The minimum level of funding provided by the ARC under Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 is $150,000 per annum and the maximum level of funding cannot exceed 75 per cent of the total direct cost of the eligible budget item(s). Funding is provided for up to one year; or, up to 5 years for leasing infrastructure, equipment or facilities, the construction of research infrastructure, or subscription or coordinated access to international facilities and major national facilities.

Summary of Outcomes

The ARC received a total of 104 applications for Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities for funding commencing in 2024, of which one application was withdrawn.

The overall success rate for Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities for funding commencing in 2024 is 34.0 per cent.

Of the unsuccessful applications, one was found to not meet eligibility requirements.

A comparison of success rates and funding amounts is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Comparison of application numbers, success rates, requested and allocated funds for approved Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities applications from 2023 and 2024.

Funding year	Applications considered	Applications approved	Success rate (%)	Requested funds over project life for all applications considered ($)	Requested funds over project life for approved applications ($)	Funds allocated over project life for approved applications*($)	Return rate for approved applications (%)
2023	133	45	33.8	$133,141,926	$42,942,422	$39,515,942	92.0
2024	103	35	34.0	$107,795,718	$31,632,111	$28,158,347	89.0

*May include indicative funds
 

Outcomes by discipline

A summary of outcomes by discipline is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Application numbers, success rates and requested and allocated funds for approved Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 applications by discipline.

Discipline *	Applications considered	Applications approved	Success rate (%)	Requested funds over project life for all applications considered ($)	Requested funds over project life for approved applications ($)	Funds over project life for approved applications ($)	Return Rate for approved applications (%)
BSB	18	7	38.9	$16,601,503	$4,389,069	$4,181,609	95.3
EIC	50	13	26.0	$49,070,161	$12,893,977	$11,421,718	88.6
HCA	2	0	0	$2,843,777	-	-	-
MPCE	29	14	48.3	$34,683,698	$13,745,008	$12,055,020	87.7
SBE	4	1	25.0	$4,596,579	$604,057	$500,000	82.8
Total	103	35	34.0	$107,795,718	$31,632,111	$28,158,347	89.0

* BSB – Biological Sciences and Biotechnology; EIC – Engineering, Information and Computing Sciences; HCA – Humanities and Creative Arts; MPCE – Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; SBE – Social, Behavioural and Economic Sciences

Outcomes by Administering Organisation

A summary of outcomes by Administering Organisation is shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Number of applications and success rates for approved Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 applications by Administering Organisation.

 

Administering Organisation	Applications considered	Applications approved	Success rate (%)	Funds over project life for approved applications ($)
Australian Capital Territory	3	0	0	-
The Australian National University	3	0	0	-
New South Wales	31	18	58.1	$14,406,279
Macquarie University	1	1	100.0	$510,000
The University of New South Wales	13	8	61.5	$6,009,386
The University of Newcastle	2	1	50.0	$450,000
The University of Sydney	10	6	60.0	$5,965,943
University of Technology, Sydney	3	1	33.3	$539,000
University of Wollongong	1	0	0	-
Western Sydney University	1	1	100.0	$931,950
Northern Territory	1	0	0	-
Charles Darwin University	1	0	0	-
Queensland	16	6	37.5	$4,519,675
Griffith University	3	1	33.3	$193,125
James Cook University	1	1	100.0	$350,000
Queensland University of Technology	3	1	33.3	$638,853
The University of Queensland	8	3	37.5	$3,337,697
University of Southern Queensland	1	0	0	-
South Australia	10	5	50.0	$4,660,721
Flinders University	2	2	100.0	$2,050,000
The University of Adelaide	7	2	28.6	$2,080,000
University of South Australia	1	1	100.0	$530,721
Tasmania	3	2	66.7	$970,000
University of Tasmania	3	2	66.7	$970,000
Victoria	32	3	9.4	$3,310,000
Deakin University	3	0	0	-
La Trobe University	1	0	0	-
Monash University	11	2	18.2	$2,570,000
RMIT University	8	1	12.5	$740,000
Swinburne University of Technology	4	0	0	-
The University of Melbourne	5	0	0	-
Western Australia	7	1	14.3	$291,672
Curtin University	4	1	25.0	$291,672
The University of Western Australia	3	0	0	-
Total	103	35	34.0	$28,158,347

Career age and gender

Of the 1103 Chief Investigators (CIs) in this round, 308 were female, 794 were male and one was unspecified. The success rate for female and male and unspecified CIs in Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 is 35.4 per cent, 32.4 per cent and 0 per cent respectively.

Success rates of CIs by career age and gender in Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 are presented in Figure 1. CIs who did not provide gender information (0.1 per cent) and CIs who did not specify the date of completion of their PhD or who do not hold a PhD (0.2 per cent) are not represented in the figure below.

Figure 1. Participation and success rate of Chief Investigators (CIs) in Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 by gender and career age*

*Career age is calculated as years since PhD (or equivalent). The earliest PhD award date was used where there was more than one PhD.

 

Collaboration with Other Eligible Organisations, Partner Organisations and Other Organisations

Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities applications are expected to develop collaborative arrangements with Other Eligible Organisations and/or Partner Organisations and Other Organisations.

A summary of success rates by number of Eligible Organisations is shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 application success rates by number of Eligible Organisations.

Number of Eligible Organisations*	Number of applications considered	Number of applications approved	Success rate within band (%)
1	6	4	66.7
2	13	4	30.8
3	14	6	42.9
4	23	9	39.1
5	19	4	21.1
6	10	5	50.0
7	8	1	12.5
8	5	0	0.0
9	3	2	66.7
10	1	0	0
11	1	0	0
Total	103	35	34.0

* An application with only one Eligible Organisation (the Administering Organisation) may or may not include Partner Organisations and/or Other Organisations.
 

A summary of application success rates by number of collaborating organisations is shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 application success rates by number of collaborating organisations.

Number of collaborating organisations*	Number of applications considered	Number of applications approved	Success rate within band (%)
1	3	3	100.0
2	6	1	16.7
3	14	7	50.0
4	19	8	42.1
5	14	5	35.7
6	17	4	23.5
7	11	4	36.4
8	4	0	0
9	8	2	25.0
10	1	0	0
11	5	1	20.0
12	1	0	0.0
Total	103	35	34.0

* Collaborating organisations include the Administering Organisation, Other Eligible Organisations, Partner Organisations and Other Organisations.
 

International Collaboration

In the 103 applications considered, applicants foreshadowed 199 instances of collaboration with researchers in 38 overseas locations. Of the applications approved for funding, 17 foreshadowed 90 instances of collaboration with researchers in 28 overseas locations (Figure 2).

Figure 2. International collaborations by location in approved Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 applications*.

*The top 12 international collaboration locations are listed in Figure 1 and the remaining locations are grouped in the ‘Other’ category.
 

Leverage of ARC funding

On Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities 2024 applications approved for funding, for every dollar funded by the ARC the proposed dollar contribution of the collaborating organisations listed on these applications is $0.87. The leverage of ARC funds for approved applications is shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Leverage of ARC funds for approved applications.

Number of applications approved	Approved ARC funding	Number of unique collaborating organisations*	Incidence of involvement of collaborating organisations*	Collaborating organisation* Cash and In-kind contribution	Leverage (Collaborating organisation* contribution/ARC approved funding)
35	$28,158,347	45	164	$24,599,156	$0.87

*Collaborating organisations include the Administering Organisation, Other Eligible Organisations, Partner Organisations and Other Organisations.
 

Summary of Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities applications approved for funding

A summary of the Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities applications approved for funding commencing in 2024, by Administering Organisation is outlined in Table 7. The application titles indicate the variety of equipment, infrastructure and facilities supported in this scheme round.

Table 7. Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities applications approved for funding commencing in 2024.

Applications approved for funding	Administering Organisation	Lead CI
Compound specific isotopes of polar organic molecules in complex mixtures	Curtin University	Grice, Prof Kliti
Revitalising NMR facilities in South Australia - Stage 2	Flinders University	Johnston, A/Prof Martin
A femtosecond beamline for time-resolved momentum microscopy		Jones, Dr Darryl
Sediment Drilling Facility for environmental and genetic archives	Griffith University	Kemp, Dr Justine
Northern Australia Plant Biosecurity Facility	James Cook University	Cernusak, A/Prof Lucas
Integrated multimodal microscopy facility for single molecule analysis	Macquarie University	Wang, Prof Yuling
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope for Beam-Sensitive Materials	Monash University	Bourgeois, A/Prof Laure
A multimodal infrared, Raman and fluorescence submicron imaging microscope		Wood, Prof Bayden
High speed multi modal in-situ Transmission Electron Microscopy platform	Queensland University of Technology	Golberg, Prof Dmitri
National Electron Beam Irradiation Facility	RMIT University	Gibson, Prof Brant
Facilities for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Evaluation and Testing	The University of Adelaide	Arjomandi, Prof Maziar
An ion mobility-mass spectrometry based platform for structural proteomics		Pukala, Prof Tara
Cryogenic microwave characterization facility for quantum technologies	The University of New South Wales	Cassidy, Dr Maja
Ultra-fast structure-property characterisation of materials		Gludovatz, A/Prof Bernd
Thermophysical Property Analysers for Materials under Extreme Environments		Li, Prof Sean
The National Cycling Data and Analysis Platform (NCDAP)		Pettit, Prof Christopher
An Open Access Native Mass Spectrometry Facility		Raftery, A/Prof Mark
Ultrafast Infrared Spectroscopy Facility		Schmidt, Prof Timothy
Quantum microscopy facility for ultrasensitive nanoscale magnetic imaging		Seidel, Prof Jan
Integrated Tip-Enabled Nanofabrication and Characterisation at Atomic Scale		Xia, Prof Zhenhai
Small Animal In Vivo Imaging Facility with microCT imaging capabilities	The University of Newcastle	Hua, A/Prof Susan
Super-resolution platform to accelerate biological and molecular research	The University of Queensland	Fairlie, Prof David
Cryogenic Experimental Laboratory for Low-background Australian Research		Harris, Dr Glen
A national network for magnetic resonance spectroscopy		Mobli, Prof Mehdi
Australia’s fuel cells and electrolysers prototyping and testing facility	The University of Sydney	Aguey-Zinsou, Prof Kondo-Francois
Single-molecule Manipulation and Interaction Facility (SMIF)		Ju, A/Prof Lining (Arnold)
In-situ nanomechanical testing for materials under extreme environments		Liao, Prof Xiaozhou
Dedicated High-throughput 3D-Electron Diffractometer		Ling, Prof Chris
Deep imaging for understanding molecular processes in complex organisms		New, Prof Elizabeth
Powder Manufacturing Facility for Additive Manufacturing		Proust, Prof Gwenaelle
State-of-the-art atomic force microscopy facilities for South Australia	University of South Australia	Blencowe, A/Prof Anton
Advanced HR-ICP-MS facility for marine, Antarctic and environmental samples	University of Tasmania	Bowie, Prof Andrew
Acquisition of an advanced Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter for Tasmania.		Taberlay, A/Prof Phillippa
Federated Omniverse Facilities for Smart Digital Futures	University of Technology Sydney	Cao, Prof Longbing
Australian Advanced Metabolic Signal Discovery, and Imaging Platform	Western Sydney University	McQuinn, Dr Ryan